<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evolution &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/category/science/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org</link>
	<description>Evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Science and pseudoscience: How do you identify between the two?</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/creation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/creation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many different practices and fields that claim to be science. These fields may take elements from science, to disguise themselves as an actual science. These fields are called pseudoscience&#8217;s. The prefix &#8220;pseudo&#8221; means fake. The reason why pseudoscience&#8217;s disguise themselves as real science is to better establish their ideals and beliefs as true [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_39" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><img src="http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Pseudoscience.jpg" alt="Pseudoscience" title="Pseudoscience" width="480" height="270" class="size-full wp-image-39" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Pseudoscience</p></div>
<p>There are many different practices and fields that claim to be science. These fields may take elements from science, to disguise themselves as an actual science. These fields are called pseudoscience&#8217;s. The prefix &#8220;pseudo&#8221; means fake. The reason why pseudoscience&#8217;s disguise themselves as real science is to better establish their ideals and beliefs as true and common knowledge. Intelligent design, the belief that the earth and all of its inhabitants were created from a higher being such as God is a pseudoscience that infiltrated its way into many scientific textbooks in schools. Pseudoscience&#8217;s never do scientific research to prove facts.</p>
<p>Many examples of pseudoscience&#8217;s and beliefs stemming from pseudoscience&#8217;s include astrology, ESP, ghosts, intelligent design, and psychics. All of these hold ideas that are untested and have never been proven true in any standardized scientific way. They sometimes take some scientific facts and merge them with untrue knowledge in order to further establish false foundation of integrity. Listed below are the main differences between science and pseudoscience.</p>
<p>1. Pseudoscience, unlike science, displays unreferenced claims by expressing bogus &#8220;facts&#8221; without scientific research:</p>
<p>The bogus facts are usually centralized around the claim made by the pseudoscience and are never backed up by reputable sources.</p>
<p>2. Pseudoscience as opposed to science, does not meet guidelines when conducting so-called scientific research:</p>
<p>Newspaper clippings, hearsay, and citations of other pseudoscience books are all used to further their spread of false information without scientific research. They rarely or never make an independent investigation to ensure the integrity of their sources.</p>
<p>3. Pseudoscience creates a hypothesis just like a science in so called scientific research, but only identifies facts that back up that hypothesis.</p>
<p>A hypothesis usually created by pseudoscience&#8217;s for scientific research are usually tied to sensitive emotional beliefs. Therefore, conflicts that contradict it are often ignored and overlooked. Alternative possibilities for scientific research are never considered either and they always appeal to widespread misconceptions.</p>
<p>4. Pseudoscience relies on &#8220;subjective validation&#8221; in scientific research:</p>
<p>A person experiences chronic back pain every day, and one night his or her pain is greatly reduced. It just so happens that this night, the moon was full. A pseudoscience would come to the conclusion that the full moon alleviated his or her pain. Science, on the other hand, would come up with a more direct reasoning for the reduction of pain through scientific research, and not based on coincidences or circumstance.</p>
<p>5. Pseudoscience relies heavily on conventions of human culture, rather than the universal regularities of nature:</p>
<p>An example of this notion is that astrology relies heavily on months, a man-made measurement of time, to determine one&#8217;s personality, likes, and dislikes. Also, it depends on the names given to planets and stars, etc. Astronomy would not depend on names, but rather the characteristics of the planets and stars themselves for scientific research.</p>
<p>6. Pseudoscience always avoids applying claims to substantial tests:</p>
<p>Pseudo scientists never create or test their beliefs in experiments and they never follow up either. If one pseudo scientist claims to have performed an experiment to solidify his or her beliefs, another one will never test his or her conclusions in another experiment. In science, experiments are repeated over and over all over the world. Scientists are encouraged to test other scientists&#8217; claims as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/creation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the best way to study science books and textbooks?</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/science-books.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/science-books.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When studying science either at a school, for personal knowledge, or for work, it can sometimes be overwhelming with the amount of information and concepts that it provides. Reading a science book is one thing, but you should make sure that the information that you read is understood and retained. There are two components of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_25" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><img src="http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Science-Books.jpg" alt="Science Books" title="Science Books" width="480" height="270" class="size-full wp-image-25" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Science Books</p></div>
<p>When studying science either at a school, for personal knowledge, or for work, it can sometimes be overwhelming with the amount of information and concepts that it provides. Reading a science book is one thing, but you should make sure that the information that you read is understood and retained. There are two components of science books that should be noted and emphasized&#8211; terminology and concepts. These tips will help you get the A on the big exam, gain and retain science knowledge to help you in further learning, and creating the best work possible on the job.</p>
<p>1. What you should know about scientific terminology in science books</p>
<p>As the case in any class, let alone science classes, it is always a good idea to scan the chapters contained in  science books so that you have a firm understanding about what you are going to learn, even if you do not fully understand it as of yet. </p>
<p>You should ask yourself: How do I learn best? Am I a visual learner or an auditor learner?</p>
<p>Visual learners benefit from seeing and writing down information. Auditory listeners may find it easier to hear a word as a professor or teacher may define something in class. You may want to consider reading the book aloud in this case. </p>
<p>No matter if you are a visual or auditory learner, you may benefit by using both techniques. If you are studying science books, you should read the book, then copy down terms and definitions. Finally, you should read these terms and definitions to yourself to develop a firm understanding about what they mean.</p>
<p>Learning root words in science will allow you to better understand terminology that you encounter later. Science is a field with many root words that are organized in logical ways. The root word &#8220;bio&#8221; means life, therefore you should have a firm understanding what biology is the study of and what biologists do. This will ensure that you will not be overwhelmed with diving head first into science books.</p>
<p>2. What you should know about studying concepts in science books and textbooks.</p>
<p>Having a good imagination is key in understanding how science works. You should use your imagination to picture a description in your science books of cellular mitosis and you will better understand it and retain that information. </p>
<p>When you are studying science books, use the illustrations that they contain to your advantage. Refer back to illustrations as science concepts are described in the book. Make sure that you have a firm understanding of how the descriptions and illustrations interweave to provide you with the fullest understanding of science concepts.</p>
<p>If you believe that science books do not provide enough visual information, try creating your own sketches using descriptions that you read in the science text. Remember, that science is as highly visual as it is abstract. Try to use both techniques to your advantage to gain a further knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evolution-rome2009.org/science-books.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
